<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brandon&#039;s movie memory &#187; 1970&#8242;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/tag/1970s/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal</link>
	<description>Deeper Into Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ici et Ailleurs (1976, Godard/Gorin/Mieville)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7672</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7672#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne-Marie Mieville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jean-luc godard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean-Pierre Gorin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May 1968]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=7672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Onscreen text, much talk about the workers, pictures of Hitler and holocaust, calm voiceover and mentions of may 68. Yup, it&#8217;s a post-60&#8242;s Godard film, alright. Here he takes his textual analysis to new heights, obsessing over the word AND (or ET). It manages a level of interest similar to Tout va bien, significantly higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Onscreen text, much talk about the workers, pictures of Hitler and holocaust, calm voiceover and mentions of may 68.  Yup, it&#8217;s a post-60&#8242;s Godard film, alright.  Here he takes his textual analysis to new heights, obsessing over the word AND (or ET).  It manages a level of interest similar to <em><a href="/journal/archives/7521">Tout va bien</a></em>, significantly higher than <em><a href="/journal/archives/7521">Letter to Jane</a></em>.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/icietailleurs4.jpg"></p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/icietailleurs5.jpg"></p>
<p>No onscreen credits (at least on my copy).  The last Godard-Gorin collaboration, Mieville taking over for Gorin.  Once again they speak within the film about its own creation and intent.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/icietailleurs6.jpg"></p>
<p>&#8220;In 1970 this film was called <em>Victory</em>. In 1974 it is called <em>Here and Elsewhere</em>.&#8221;  Looks like <em>Victory</em> was a Palestinian propaganda movie.  &#8220;Here&#8221; they stage scenes of a family watching television, and filmmakers displaying stills one by one before a camera.  Lots of talk about the nature and meaning of images.  It&#8217;s not as bad as it sounds.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/icietailleurs3.jpg"></p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/icietailleurs2.jpg"></p>
<p>Rosenbaum:</p>
<blockquote><p>Jean-Luc Godard&#8217;s short feature about the PLO was initially shot with Jean-Pierre Gorin in the Middle East in 1970, but when he edited the footage with Anne-Marie Mieville several years later, many of the soldiers that had been filmed were dead. Reflecting on this fact, as well as on the problems of recording history and of making political statements on film, Godard and Mieville produced a thoughtful and provocative essay on the subject. Coming after the mainly arid reaches of Godard&#8217;s &#8220;Dziga Vertov Group&#8221; period (roughly 1968-1973), when his efforts were largely directed toward severing his relation with commercial filmmaking and toward forging new ways to &#8220;make films politically,&#8221; this film assimilates many of the lessons he learned without the posturing and masochism that marred much of his earlier work. The results are a rare form of lucidity and purity.</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/icietailleurs1.jpg"></p>
<p>Buy from Amazon:<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007RUZ2M2/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=deeintmov-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B007RUZ2M2">Ici et Ailleurs DVD</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=deeintmov-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B007RUZ2M2" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7672/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silent Running (1972, Douglas Trumbull)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7631</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7631#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Dern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Trumbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dystopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hippies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=7631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the first movies in ages that we&#8217;ve tried to watch with people over, ending as usual in failure. I knew it would be sci-fi with an environmentalism theme, but wasn&#8217;t prepared for the woeful hippie Joan Baez songs. Pretty good story/ending/character with pretty good physical action and pre-Star Wars model work, with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the first movies in ages that we&#8217;ve tried to watch with people over, ending as usual in failure.  I knew it would be sci-fi with an environmentalism theme, but wasn&#8217;t prepared for the woeful hippie Joan Baez songs.  Pretty good story/ending/character with pretty good physical action and pre-<em>Star Wars</em> model work, with a couple of exceptional elements.  First, obviously, Bruce Dern is wonderful and gets better in the second half when he has nobody but himself and his robot drones to act against.  Then there&#8217;s the drones &#8211; they worried me because I couldn&#8217;t figure them out.  They&#8217;re not shaped correctly to have an actor inside, their robotic parts are truly 1970&#8242;s-robotic-looking (simple and slow), but their leg movements looked too natural to not be human.  I wouldn&#8217;t have guessed there were amputee actors inside.  Effects whiz Trumbull brings some of his <em>2001: A Space Odyssey</em> expertise to a sequence where Dern pilots the ship through Saturn&#8217;s rings to escape detection &#8211; otherwise it&#8217;s mostly bunches of boxes painted silver in front of a starfield.</p>
<p><em>Two &#8220;drones&#8221; in foreground, with greenhouse-pod behind:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/silentrunning2.jpg"></p>
<p>No explanation is given, but Earth sends commands for the deep-space (why didn&#8217;t they stay in orbit?) stations that hold the last of the dystopian planet&#8217;s plants and wild animals to detonate their greenhouse pods and return home.  Three fun-lovin&#8217; astronaut dudes wheel off in their rovers with suitcases full of nukes to complete the task, but Dern loses his cool, kills one of &#8216;em with a shovel (his leg is hurt in the scuffle) and lets the others explode in a doomed greenhouse, then escapes past Saturn (&#8220;killing&#8221; one of his three drones, which gives him and the other drones more distress than the human deaths do).  Interestingly, the submarine-style radio/radar silence of the title is never directly addressed in dialogue or on computer screens &#8211; it&#8217;s just inferred that Dern is making his escape, leaving the authorities to believe that his ship was destroyed.  I&#8217;d give Trumbull and his writers (two of whom would later write <em>The Deer Hunter</em>, the other would become a major TV procedural-show writer/producer) credit for letting the audience add interpretation instead of overexplaining everything, but other evidence (like the blatant, subtext-killing Baez songs, the oversentimental but otherwise extremely simple robots and Dern&#8217;s confusing leg-injury subplot) would indicate bungled storytelling instead.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/silentrunning1.jpg"></p>
<p>There&#8217;s not much suspense left after Dern has killed off his fellow astronauts.  The movie tries to make us care when he&#8217;s joyriding his dune-buggy and injures a robot, and tries to make us believe that a botanist wouldn&#8217;t realize that plants need sunlight.  But really it&#8217;s all build-up to the last five minutes, when he&#8217;s located and about to be &#8220;rescued&#8221;.  He sets the sole working robot to the task of watching over the last garden dome, then jettisons it to safety and sets nukes to blow himself (and his rescuers?) into space-junk.</p>
<p>Part of the same financing program to let young filmmakers run wild on low-budget pictures, along with <em>American Graffiti</em> and <em><a href="/journal/archives/4707">The Last Movie</a></em>.  Sounds like a program they should&#8217;ve continued. Music by PDQ Bach under his real name.</p>
<p>Buy from Amazon:<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000063UR1/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=deeintmov-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B000063UR1">Silent Running DVD</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=deeintmov-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000063UR1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7631/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Past and Present (1972, Manoel de Oliveira)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7524</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7524#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 01:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manoel de Oliveira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portugal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=7524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The earliest Oliveira movie I&#8217;ve seen by three decades &#8211; and he was making movies three decades earlier than this. That would explain why this already feels like the work of an old master, even though I was considering it &#8220;early Oliveira.&#8221; The camera&#8217;s not as exactingly positioned as in Resnais films like Melo and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The earliest Oliveira movie I&#8217;ve seen by three decades &#8211; and he was making movies three decades earlier than this.  That would explain why this already feels like the work of an old master, even though I was considering it &#8220;early Oliveira.&#8221;  The camera&#8217;s not as exactingly positioned as in Resnais films like <em><a href="/journal/archives/6419">Melo</a></em> and <em><a href="/journal/archives/6074">Love Unto Death</a></em>, but it has a similar feeling to those, the masterful European period dramas that seem at time to be filmed plays but with a mysterious sense that there&#8217;s always something more going on.</p>
<p><em>The Silent Gardener:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/pastpresent1.jpg"></p>
<p>According to the wikipedia, Oliveira fell afoul of the government in the mid-60&#8242;s, accused of surrealism, then was silent for years until this film&#8217;s release.  More: &#8220;With its lyrical surrealism and farcical situations, the film was a shift from his earlier work about lower class people. Based on a play by Joao Cesar Monteiro . . . <em>Past and Present</em> was the first of what has become known as Oliveira&#8217;s &#8220;Tetralogy of frustrated loves&#8221;. It was followed by <em>Benilde or the Virgin Mother</em>, <em>Doomed Love</em> and <em>Francisca</em>. Each of these films share the theme of unfulfilled love, the backdrop of a repressive society, and the beginning of Oliveira&#8217;s unique cinematic style.&#8221;  It&#8217;s got that mannered surrealism typical of Bunuel&#8217;s late career &#8211; you can see how the two filmmakers got <a href="/journal/archives/595">tangled together</a>.  Couldn&#8217;t tell if Oliveira was abusing the film&#8217;s soundtrack in various ways or (most likely) if the broadcast source of my video copy was a bit wonky.  Second movie I&#8217;ve seen recently to use music by Mendelssohn.  There&#8217;s not much written about the film online &#8211; even my most reliable Oliveira-advocate Rosenbaum had not seen this one, as of his writings circa <em>Christopher Columbus, The Enigma</em>.</p>
<p>First scene is a gathering of friends attending the funeral of Vanda&#8217;s ex-husband Ricardo.  She abuses current husband Firmino, forbids him from attending.  I don&#8217;t think Ricardo has just died &#8211; this is &#8220;the burial of his remains&#8221; two years later?  &#8220;A year after his death, she married Firmino, and a year later, she fell in love with the former husband. An unhealthy passion for the deceased husband, the same that bothered her in life, and, at the same time, what an anger for poor Firmino!&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Firmino with hateful wife Vanda:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/pastpresent4.jpg"></p>
<p>Also at the party: Fernando (sideburns, glasses) and Noemia (light hair, pulled back), a divorced couple with a better, more loving relationship than when they were married.  Honorio (balding) and Angelica (reddish hair) are married, but slightly-shaggy, Depardieu-looking Mauricio is in love with Angelica.  And finally there&#8217;s Daniel, the deceased Ricardo&#8217;s identical twin brother. Firmino is caught considering stabbing his wife to death, but holds back.</p>
<p>A year later, Firmino writes a suicide note then leaps from the window (comically avoiding being caught by the silent gardener).  It takes him days to die, days his wife Vanda spends cursing his name and ordering a coffin &#8211; and the friends all gather at the house again.  Angelica has been living with Mauricio, but he tells her to return to her husband (&#8220;This adultery will make you appreciate more the virtues of fidelity, just as a trip abroad reveals the sweetness of the homeland&#8221;) because he&#8217;s now in love with Noemia.</p>
<p><em>Cheaters Mauricio and Angelica:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/pastpresent5.jpg"></p>
<p>Moments before her husband dies, Daniel reveals to Vanda that he&#8217;s really Ricardo, that the brothers had swapped clothes before the fatal car accident and he swapped his wedding ring afterwards.</p>
<p>&#8220;Vanda, your husband is dead&#8221;<br />
<em>L-R: Noemia (Manuela de Freitas of some Joao Cesar Monteiro films), Honorio (Duarte de Almeida of Magic Mirror, The Convent), Fernando, Angelica.</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/pastpresent3.jpg"></p>
<p>Another year &#8211; A judge has declared that Vanda and Ricardo are still married, so she&#8217;s now in love with the dead Firmino.  Angelica is back with Mauricio and getting dumped again.</p>
<p><em>Ricardo spies Vanda hanging pictures of deceased Firmino around the house:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/pastpresent6.jpg"></p>
<p><em>Daniel/Ricardo:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/pastpresent2.jpg"></p>
<p>A friend is getting married, so the friends gather again, and the movie ends with the exchanging of wedding vows and Mendelssohn&#8217;s <em>Wedding March</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7524/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walkabout (1971, Nicolas Roeg)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7522</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7522#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 03:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinematography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criterion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Roeg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=7522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I probably put off watching this for so long because I&#8217;d written down years ago that I&#8217;d already seen it, in the dark days of the pre-blog era. No recollection of any scenes while watching, so that must&#8217;ve been in error. Based on a novel, though I wonder how much of the original writing is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably put off watching this for so long because I&#8217;d written down years ago that I&#8217;d already seen it, in the dark days of the pre-blog era.  No recollection of any scenes while watching, so that must&#8217;ve been in error. Based on a novel, though I wonder how much of the original writing is left after Roeg got through with it.  Roeg&#8217;s first movie with a solo directing credit.  Jenny Agutter (&#8220;the girl&#8221;) went on to star in <em>An American Werewolf in London</em> and <em>Child&#8217;s Play 2</em>, Nic Roeg&#8217;s son Luc (&#8220;white boy&#8221;) is now a producer, worked on <em><a href="/journal/archives/7013">Spider</a></em> and <em>We Need to Talk About Kevin</em>, and David Gulpilil, only 18 when this came out, became the most reliable Aboriginal actor from <em>The Last Wave</em> to <em><a href="/journal/archives/327">Ten Canoes</a></em>.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/walkabout4.jpg"></p>
<p>The kids are on a picnic with their father, when he starts shooting at them then torches the car and kills himself.  Hardly fazed, the kids walk off into the wasteland. But we know from <em><a href="/journal/archives/6754">Man Who Fell To Earth</a></em> and <em><a href="/journal/archives/6602">Insignificance</a></em> that human emotion isn&#8217;t Roeg&#8217;s strong suit, so we focus on the visuals and editing, which are amazing and strange.  For instance, mid-film there&#8217;s a page-turn transition giving the brief impression that the whole thing is a storybook.  And in the middle of a cross-fade, one of the two overlapping scenes cuts to a different shot &#8211; you don&#8217;t do that!</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/walkabout3.jpg"></p>
<p>Plenty of wildlife.  Cool lizards, parakeets, cockatoos, hawks and things I don&#8217;t even know what they&#8217;re called.  But it&#8217;s not a good movie to watch just for the pretty wildlife, unless you&#8217;re prepared to see David G. spear some kangaroos.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/walkabout1.jpg"></p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/walkabout5.jpg"></p>
<p>All sorts of extras on the Criterion release, which I need to get sometime. Meanwhile I&#8217;ve got P. Ryan&#8217;s essay from the website:</p>
<blockquote><p>Toward the film’s end, it is the turn of the young aborigine to display, by means of a sexually charged ritual dance directed at the girl. The girl’s fearful rejection of him leads to another major change from the novel. There, the native boy dies from a virus to which he would not have been exposed if not for his encounter with these outsiders; in the film, the young man takes his own life.  A film with two suicides and a delicately sensual nude scene was never destined for the label of “children’s classic,” and yet one can sense that Roeg has trust in the reaction of an adolescent audience, for he is speaking the truth of adolescence to us all.</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/walkabout6.jpg"></p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m a brilliant postcolonial scholar over here, but I saw more to David&#8217;s death than sexual rejection.  When he finds the stupid white kids, they&#8217;re desperate and dehydrated.  He shows them how to find food and water, leads them on a days-long hike to the place where he thinks the girl is asking to be led.  She just wants her own civilization, but he bypasses roads and houses, leaving them to an abandoned farmhouse.  Once there, she stops acting as his equal or follower, goes inside and cleans up, leans out the window with a bucket asking him for water, which he fetches. Now she&#8217;s in her element, and his role is to be her servant.  Then a few scenes contrasting his traditional hunting methods with the shooting massacre of a rifle-toting white man &#8211; with jarring freezes and reverse photography. The mating dance seems like he&#8217;s defensively embracing his traditions and manhood, too late.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/walkabout7.jpg"></p>
<p>Afterwards one of the great endings, <em><a href="/journal/archives/72">Petulia</a></em>-reminiscent, as she&#8217;s back in her high apartment listening to some man talk about boring business, having a flashback to when she swam naked and free with a stranger in the outback.  More from Ryan:</p>
<blockquote><p>Much has been written about the “fragmented” style that Roeg has employed in so many of his films — <em>Don’t Look Now</em>, <em>The Man Who Fell to Earth</em>, and <em>Bad Timing</em> all play with linear narrative, setting subtle traps for the viewer and commanding our close attention. In <em>Walkabout</em>, this style serves to enhance the sense of memory that pervades the film. All coming-of-age stories are fundamentally memory stories, rooted in recollections of a time of great intensity, of growing, of puzzling, of understanding. We look back at that stage in our life and find memories of the pain we felt and the pain we inflicted, unthinkingly, because we did not understand ourselves and our burgeoning relationship to a new, strange adult world. The strangeness of that world for the girl in <em>Walkabout</em> is deepened by the landscape; for the aboriginal boy, it is deepened by his encounter with people for whom his lifelong training has ill prepared him.</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/walkabout2.jpg"></p>
<p>&#8220;The happy highways where I went and cannot come again&#8221; &#8211; the closing poem is also the source of the phrase <em>Blue Remembered Hills</em>.  And as Roeg borrowed, so was he borrowed from &#8211; one kid saying &#8220;I don&#8217;t suppose it matters which way we go&#8221; was used in the Books song <em>Be Good To Them Always</em>.</p>
<p>Buy from Amazon:<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00393SG3S/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=deeintmov-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B00393SG3S">Walkabout (Criterion blu-ray)</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=deeintmov-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B00393SG3S" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7522/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tout Va Bien/Letter To Jane (1972, Godard &amp; Gorin)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7521</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7521#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Fonda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jean-luc godard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean-Pierre Gorin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May 1968]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yves Montand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=7521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh whoops &#8211; I planned to watch Weekend first, to go from the end of Godard&#8217;s beloved 60&#8242;s period, skip over his purely political post-May-&#8217;68 work with Gorin as the Dziga Vertov Group, and resume with Tout Va Bien and Letter to Jane. But I forgot, and watched this before Weekend. No matter, probably. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh whoops &#8211; I planned to watch <em>Weekend</em> first, to go from the end of Godard&#8217;s beloved 60&#8242;s period, skip over his purely political post-May-&#8217;68 work with Gorin as the Dziga Vertov Group, and resume with <em>Tout Va Bien</em> and <em>Letter to Jane</em>.  But I forgot, and watched this before <em>Weekend</em>.  No matter, probably.  But as I&#8217;d heard, the Godard of the 60&#8242;s never returned after &#8217;68.  This is so similar to his 60&#8242;s movies, despite the bright pop color, the custom-built sets, meta-movie voiceover, married-couple storyline and (especially) major stars.  No, it&#8217;s as talky as <em><a href="/journal/archives/3253">The Owl&#8217;s Legacy</a></em>.</p>
<p><em><a href="/journal/archives/7414">Long-Distance Singer</a></em> Yves Montand and newly-oscar-winning Jane Fonda were both known to be politically-engaged, and both were hugely popular at the time, so it was perfect casting for Godard and Gorin &#8211; plus an opportunity for them to gripe about Montand&#8217;s previous &#8220;problematic&#8221; political films.  But G &#038; G really want to polemicize at length, so they note in the voiceover that the stars were cast and given a jaded love story out of commercial necessity.</p>
<p><em>Unwitting pawns in Godard and Gorin&#8217;s political agenda:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/toutvabien4.jpg"></p>
<p><em>Boss Caprioli:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/toutvabien2.jpg"></p>
<p>Opens with JLG&#8217;s most cinematic-illusion-shattering move yet, close-ups on all the checks he&#8217;s cutting for the film&#8217;s stars, technicians, sets and so on.  The juicy center of the film (shot in nice loooong shots, many of them motionless) consists mainly of dudes giving long speeches about union labor, class divisions, the political system.</p>
<p>&#8220;Under a calm surface, everything&#8217;s changing. Everything&#8217;s changing within every class. And She and He, swept up in it, also change.&#8221;  Yves is a formerly-idealistic filmmaker (&#8220;a screenwriter during the New Wave&#8221;), now doing commercial work. Jane is a radio news reporter, and the two are at a factory office when the workers hold a major strike and lock the boss in his office for five days.  So we get interviews with the boss (Vittorio Caprioli of <em>Il Generale della Rovere</em>): &#8220;the glaring injustices of Marx&#8217; and Engels&#8217; day are over,&#8221; and the shop steward: &#8220;our salaries haven&#8217;t kept up with increasing production, and even less with corporate profits.&#8221;  It&#8217;s weird for a leftist, pro-workers movie that I can easily find who played the company manager, but not which actor played Stacquet the shop steward.</p>
<p>Some business in a supermarket that I didn&#8217;t understand because I wasn&#8217;t paying close attention anymore, but the long back-and-forth dolly shot reminded me of the factory scene in <em><a href="/journal/archives/593">Manufactured Landscapes</a></em>.  Yves and Jane at their day jobs.  Scenes of the factory in operation, of struggle in the streets.  A token love-story-resolution ending in a cafe, which seems extraneous even as a joke, since the couple never got any development.</p>
<p><em>Great cross-section of the factory offices:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/toutvabien1.jpg"></p>
<p><em>Yves, disillusioned:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image12/toutvabien3.jpg"></p>
<p>From an interview with a wide-eyed bathrobe-clad Godard: &#8220;It&#8217;s quite striking. When workers are interviewed [on TV], these people are given 15 brief seconds when they haven&#8217;t opened their mouths all year.  We give them 15 seconds, or even three minutes, to speak. &#8216;What do you think of the strike? What do you think of your lot in life?&#8217; Who can answer when he&#8217;s had his mouth sewn shut?&#8221;</p>
<p><strong><em>Letter To Jane</em> (1972)</strong></p>
<p>An hour-long photo-essay posed as a letter to Jane Fonda, analyzing a newspaper photo of her in Vietnam talking (or, as Godard &#038; Gorin rightly point out, listening) to some unidentified men.  She&#8217;d visited the country after the filming of <em>Tout Va Bien</em> but before its release, starting the ridiculous &#8220;Hanoi Jane&#8221; controversy, during which the press took the actions of a movie star more seriously than the war itself.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image12/toutvabien5.jpg"></p>
<p>Godard and Gorin take turns narrating (in English), and each takes pains to avoid any interest in their voice, so the movie becomes a didactic lullaby.  I got bored almost immediately.</p>
<p>See also: <em><a href="/journal/archives/3714">Every Revolution is a Throw of the Dice</a></em> and Farocki&#8217;s <em><a href="/journal/archives/564">Workers Leaving The Factory</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7521/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even Dwarfs Started Small (1970, Werner Herzog)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7011</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 04:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwarfs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Werner Herzog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=7011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no words.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/journal/image11/evendwarfs4.jpg"></p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/evendwarfs2.jpg"></p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/evendwarfs6.jpg"></p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/evendwarfs3.jpg"></p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/evendwarfs1.jpg"></p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/evendwarfs5.jpg"></p>
<p>I have no words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7011/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tommy (1975, Ken Russell)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7014</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7014#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 21:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Russell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorial screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=7014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Tommy is the only rock opera ever made&#8221; &#8211; Ken Russell Sad Ann-Margret&#8217;s husband is killed in the war. Some time later she goes on vacation and meets Bernie (Oliver Reed) at a resort. He moves in, but one night the husband returns, disfigured from a plane crash, and Bernie kills him in front of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tommy is the only rock opera ever made&#8221; &#8211; Ken Russell</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/tommy1.jpg"></p>
<p>Sad Ann-Margret&#8217;s husband is killed in the war.  Some time later she goes on vacation and meets Bernie (Oliver Reed) at a resort.  He moves in, but one night the husband returns, disfigured from a plane crash, and Bernie kills him in front of little Tommy, who&#8217;s told that he didn&#8217;t see anything, didn&#8217;t hear anything, won&#8217;t say anything.  And so he doesn&#8217;t ever again.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/tommy2.jpg"></p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/tommy3.jpg"></p>
<p>Tommy grows up to be curly-haired space-cadet Roger Daltrey.  He&#8217;s not healed by attending Eric Clapton&#8217;s church of Marilyn worship, nor when Bernie gives him a night with extreme drug fiend Tina Turner (filling in for David Bowie), nor when he&#8217;s left with psychically abusive babysitter Paul Nicholas or sexually abusive Uncle Ernie (Keith Moon), nor from a visit to Dr. Jack Nicholson (filling in for Christopher Lee).</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/tommy4.jpg"></p>
<p>But one day Tommy finds something he&#8217;s good at.  After defeating Elton John (who agreed to be in the movie provided he got to keep these boots) at a pinball championship, he becomes famous and attracts hundreds of groupies.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/tommy5.jpg"></p>
<p>At home, mom celebrates their new wealth by throwing a bottle of champagne through the television and writhing in the bubbles, baked beans and chocolate that pour forth from the damaged set.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/tommy7.jpg"></p>
<p>Tommy breaks through his mom&#8217;s mirror and starts speaking again, becomes a messiah to kids everywhere, his symbol a cross with a pinball on top.  Mom is his biggest supporter, and stepdad Bernie is the financial wizard, plotting to set up Tommy camps everywhere and sell merchandise everywhere else.  But their prefab religion backfires and the kids revolt, killing Tommy&#8217;s parents.  But he lives to bathe in waterfalls and climb mountains with a big cheery grin.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a ridiculous story, a twisted excuse for lots of music and celebrity cameos.  Russell was never a huge fan of rock music (I&#8217;m not a big Who fan myself, really only enjoy &#8220;I&#8217;m a Sensation&#8221; from this soundtrack), had written a follow-up to <em><a href="/journal/archives/979">The Devils</a></em> called <em>The Angels</em> about false religion, which he couldn&#8217;t get off the ground.  When offered to direct a movie with sympathetic ideas to his own, which Russell could help mold (he got Pete Townshend to write additional scenes and change plot details) with a pre-sold celebrity cast &#8211; a batshit-crazy musical story that needed visual accompaniment &#8211; how could Ken say no?  It might not be Ken&#8217;s purest personal vision, but I double-featured it with <em><a href="/journal/archives/7069">Song of Summer</a></em> as memorial screenings when I heard he&#8217;d died.</p>
<p>Unsurprisingly produced by Robert Stigwood, who produced <em>Jesus Christ Superstar</em> (and later <em><a href="/journal/archives/426">Grease</a></em>).  Oliver Reed (of <em>The Devils</em>, of course) was doing Richard Lester&#8217;s Musketeers movies around the same time.  Daltrey would be back with Russell on <em>Lisztomania</em>, which I need to see.  And Ann-Margret needs to be much more popular &#8211; she was fantastic in this.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/tommy6.jpg"></p>
<p>Buy from Amazon:<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003LSTL5S/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=deeintmov-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B003LSTL5S">Tommy blu-ray</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=deeintmov-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B003LSTL5S" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7014/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foxy Brown (1974, Jack Hill)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7007</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7007#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pam Grier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=7007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a cheap-ass movie. The fights are clumsy, the acting seems first-take, the overall look is made-for-TV and the audio always sounds like there&#8217;s a photocopier running nearby. It&#8217;s a fun time though, if you overlook the unpleasant bit where Foxy is drugged and raped by rednecks. At least she reserves her harshest revenge for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a cheap-ass movie.  The fights are clumsy, the acting seems first-take, the overall look is made-for-TV and the audio always sounds like there&#8217;s a photocopier running nearby.  It&#8217;s a fun time though, if you overlook the unpleasant bit where Foxy is drugged and raped by rednecks.  At least she reserves her harshest revenge for these two guys &#8211; one gets his face torn off then they both get set on fire.  Can&#8217;t you just picture a twelve-year-old Quentin Tarantino sitting alone in a broken-down movie theater burning this movie into his brain?</p>
<p><em>Foxy and &#8220;Michael&#8221;:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image11/foxybrown2.jpg"></p>
<p>Pam Grier (who&#8217;d already starred in <em>Coffy</em> and a couple others) is in love with her undercover boyfriend &#8220;Michael&#8221; (Terry Carter of <em>Battlestar Galactica</em>), who is killed by drug-dealer enforcers the day he&#8217;s released from the hospital post-plastic-surgery, because Foxy&#8217;s own brother Link rats on him for quick cash.</p>
<p><em>Link in trouble:</em><br />
<img src="/journal/image11/foxybrown1.jpg"></p>
<p>The movie shows us repeatedly that Foxy is a total badass, and Pam Grier is up to the task, but Antonio Fargas (best known as &#8220;Huggy Bear&#8221; on <em>Starsky &#038; Hutch</em>) as Link is the one actor with enough energy to transcend his low-rent surroundings.  On the other end of the spectrum are white crime lords Kathryn Loder and Peter Brown (a teen delinquent in <em>Kitten with a Whip</em>) who at least seem to be having a good time delivering their awkwardly terrible performances.  Foxy masquerades as a prostitute, a dumb broad and a revolutionary, and kills pretty much everybody.</p>
<p>Buy from Amazon:<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000053VBA/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=deeintmov-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B000053VBA">Foxy Brown DVD</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=deeintmov-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000053VBA" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7007/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Beast (1975, Walerian Borowczyk)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7003</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7003#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walerian Borowczyk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=7003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How come whenever a speaking actor&#8217;s back is turned, the filmmaker thinks they can add a dubbed line and we won&#8217;t notice? One of those DVDs I used to excitedly pick up at Tower Records and walk around with for an hour before deciding that it might not be worth $27 after all. Another was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come whenever a speaking actor&#8217;s back is turned, the filmmaker thinks they can add a dubbed line and we won&#8217;t notice?</p>
<p>One of those DVDs I used to excitedly pick up at Tower Records and walk around with for an hour before deciding that it might not be worth $27 after all.  Another was <em><a href="/journal/archives/542">La Belle Noiseuse</a></em>, which turned out to be decidedly worth $27.  This one wasn&#8217;t even worth the time spent watching it.</p>
<p>As a former animator turned live-action director, Walerian joins (and sullies) the proud ranks of Tim Burton, Terry Gilliam, David Lynch, Jan Svankmajer, Frank Tashlin, the Bros. Quay, Emily Hubley and possibly Brad Bird and Andrew Stanton.  I noticed all the snails in this movie and remembered his snail-porn animated short <em><a href="/journal/archives/300">Escargot de Venus</a></em> from the same year.</p>
<p><img src="/journal/image11/beast.jpg"></p>
<p>The movie opens with close-ups of horse sex, so I knew it wasn&#8217;t going to be elegant, despite its fancy trappings.  A rich girl and her aunt head for the French countryside to see about marrying the girl to the French family&#8217;s son.  But the story is just an excuse for the massive rape scene between &#8220;the beast&#8221; and some lucky girl.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know or care which characters were which, but two of the actresses were Sirpa Lane (of unrelated film <em>The Beast In Space</em>) and Elisabeth Kaza (of <em>Castle Freak</em>).</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t say it was the worst movie in the world because I kinda liked the harpsichord music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/7003/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinatown (1974, Roman Polanski)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/6912</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/6912#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1930's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faye Dunaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Nicholson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Huston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Polanski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=6912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most brightly-lit and also most pessimistic noir shown in Emory&#8217;s series. Nicholson is very good at acting natural, which he does too seldom, and John Huston is haunting as the villain, a human monster in broad daylight. I remember Faye Dunaway as being hysterical in this, but apparently I was only recalling the &#8220;she&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most brightly-lit and also most pessimistic noir shown in Emory&#8217;s series.  Nicholson is very good at acting natural, which he does too seldom, and John Huston is haunting as the villain, a human monster in broad daylight.  I remember Faye Dunaway as being hysterical in this, but apparently I was only recalling the &#8220;she&#8217;s my daughter AND my sister&#8221; scene.  Polanski himself plays a dwarf thug who cuts Jack&#8217;s nose open near the beginning of the investigation, forcing Jack to wear facial bandages through most of the movie.</p>
<p>Huston plays Dunaway&#8217;s father &#8211; he and her husband Mulwray ran the water department for years before selling it to the city, and now Huston is running a water/real estate conspiracy, stealing water from farmers and dumping it into the river.  Jack is a nobody detective taking pictures of cheating husbands when he&#8217;s used as a pawn in Huston&#8217;s schemes to discredit his former partner and recover his grand/daughter &#8211; though Jack is plenty smart enough to keep up with the plot.  He almost gets ahead, too, but loses his evidence against Huston, and loses Dunaway when the cops shoot her through the head.</p>
<p>Nominated for all the oscars, but really, what chance have you got against the likes of <em>Godfather 2</em>, <em>The Towering Inferno</em>, <em>Earthquake</em> and Art Carney?</p>
<p>Buy from Amazon:<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000UAE7RW/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=deeintmov-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B000UAE7RW">Chinatown DVD</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=deeintmov-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000UAE7RW&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/6912/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

