<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brandon&#039;s movie memory &#187; Peter Watkins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/tag/peter-watkins/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal</link>
	<description>Deeper Into Movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Month of 121 Shorts: The 50&#8242;s to the 70&#8242;s</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/3726</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/3726#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1950's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abel Ferrara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agnes Varda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[francois truffaut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Rouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jean-luc godard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jorgen Leth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Werner Herzog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=3726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Precautions Against Fanatics (1969, Werner Herzog) &#8220;Have you ever seen a dishonest man with a chest like this?&#8221; Said to Werner&#8217;s cameraman by a one-armed man in a suit: &#8220;What are you doing here? Go away!&#8221; It&#8217;s not clear who is supposed to be here where they&#8217;re filming, in the training area of a horse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Precautions Against Fanatics</em> (1969, Werner Herzog)</strong><br />
&#8220;Have you ever seen a dishonest man with a chest like this?&#8221;<br />
Said to Werner&#8217;s cameraman by a one-armed man in a suit: &#8220;What are you doing here?  Go away!&#8221;  It&#8217;s not clear who is supposed to be here where they&#8217;re filming, in the training area of a horse racetrack.  Some guy is repeating himself and karate-chopping flat stones.  This cannot actually be happening!  It is all pretty wonderful, a parody of a behind-the-scenes documentary.  Made in between <em>Signs of Life</em> and <em><a href="/journal/archives/7011">Even Dwarfs Started Small</a></em>, both of which I need to catch some day.<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts011.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><strong><em>Organism</em> (1975, Hilary Harris)</strong><br />
Time-lapse footage and readings from biological textbooks portray a large city (New York, of course) as a living organism.  The dated 70&#8242;s sound design is unfortunate but otherwise it&#8217;s completely wonderful.  Makes me wish I had a classroom of kids to show it to.  He worked on this for years, inventing a time-lapse camera in the 60&#8242;s for the purpose.  Bits from Scott MacDonald &#8220;As late as 1975, Harris apparently felt that time-lapsing imagery was unusual and high-tech enough to justify his frequent use of science-fictionish electronic sounds as an accompaniment. &#8230; Hilary Harris shot some of the New York City traffic shots used in <em>Koyaanisqatsi</em>, though apparently Reggio didn&#8217;t see <em>Organism</em> until after his film was well under way.&#8221;<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts012.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><strong><em>L&#8217;Opéra-mouffe</em> (1958, Agnes Varda)</strong><br />
Somehow I missed this during Varda Month &#8211; one of her earliest shorts hidden amongst the copious features on a Criterion DVD.  Varda films either herself or another pregnant nude women, then goes on a rampage through the marketplace, mostly capturing the faces of people shopping there, with interludes featuring actors (incl. Varda regular Dorothée Blank, as nude here as she is in <em><a href="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/2888">Cleo</a></em>) clowning around.  Sections highlight public drunkenness, anxiety and affection.  I want to say this is my favorite of her shorts so far, but then I remember they&#8217;re all so good.  Delightfully scored by a not-yet-famous Georges Delerue.<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts032.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p>&#8220;I was pregnant.  I felt the contradiction of expecting a child, being full of hope, and circulating in this world of poor, drunken people without hope, who seemed so unhappy.  I felt tenderness toward them, especially the elderly.  I imagined them as babies, when their mothers kissed their tummies.&#8221;<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts033.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><strong><em>Silent Snow, Secret Snow</em> (1966, Gene Kearney)</strong><br />
A boy named Paul starts to obsess over snow, allowing the snow in his mind to filter him from reality.  Creepy and well shot.  Later remade as a Night Gallery episode with Orson Welles narrating.  Makes me think of the Handsome Family song &#8220;Don&#8217;t Be Scared,&#8221; with its line &#8220;when Paul thinks of snow, soft winds blow &#8217;round his head,&#8221; except it&#8217;s one of their very few comforting, happy songs and the movie is anything but.<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts048.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><strong><em>Une histoire d&#8217;eau</em> (1961, Truffaut &#038; Godard)</strong><br />
A girl wakes up and the whole town is flooded from melting snow.  She meets a guy (a young Jean-Claude Brialy) who offers to drive her to Paris before nightfall.  Music is weird &#8211; gentle flute or horns punctuated with bursts of percussion.  Ooh, a Duchess of Langeais reference… in fact there are a ton of references in her quick monologue narration, which ends with spoken credits.<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts053.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><strong><em>The Forgotten Faces</em> (1960, Peter Watkins)</strong><br />
Revolution in Budapest.  Nice reconstruction, convincingly documentary-like &#8211; where&#8217;d Watkins get all those guns?  No sync sound, a TV-sounding narrator.  One part, the reading of a communist speech turns briefly into a dramatic propaganda montage &#8211; don&#8217;t see that happen much in Watkins&#8217; films.<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts034.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts035.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><strong><em>The Perfect Human</em> (1967, Jorgen Leth)</strong><br />
&#8220;Today I experienced something I hope to understand in a few days.&#8221;<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts065.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p>I like the British narrator.  &#8220;What does he want?  Why does he move like that?  How does he move like that?  Look at him.  Look at him now.  And now.  Look at him all the time.&#8221;  There&#8217;s no diegetic sound, but if this was dubbed in a studio, why does there have to be so much tape hiss?  A fake documentary and a stark white delight, with slow zooms in and out, gentle string music, and a general sense of serious absurdity.  Only saw, what, a third of this in <em>The Five Obstructions</em>.<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts066.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><strong><em>Les Maître fous</em> (1955, Jean Rouch)</strong><br />
Document of a group in Ghana called the Hauka doing something involving wooden toy guns, red ribbons, chicken sacrifice, dog-blood-drinkin&#8217; and having lurchy foaming-at-the-mouth fits.  I&#8217;m not ever quite sure, because the French narration has been auto-subtitled by google &#8211; whatever they&#8217;re doing, the subs call it &#8220;having.&#8221;  After they&#8217;ve had, the film crew catches up with them at their day jobs, not freaked-out cultists anymore, just working hard, smiling at the camera.  This is one African film that Katy didn&#8217;t want to watch, because Rouch is an exoticizing anthropologist.  So what&#8217;s going on that this film makes the best-ever lists?  A Rouch tribute page says he popularized direct cinema/cinema verite, that he was known for rethinking ethnography, and a documentary surrealism (sounds like Jean Painleve).  Ian Mundell says the film &#8220;drew plaudits from the Nouvelle Vague, in particular from Jean-Luc Godard. They liked the fact that Rouch&#8217;s fiction emerged from an encounter between the actor (professional or non-professional) and the camera, and his willingness to break the rules of cinema.&#8221;  Paul Stoller says Rouch crisscrossed &#8220;the boundaries between documentary and fiction, observer and participant,&#8221; but I take it that&#8217;s more about his later films, which I&#8217;m thinking I would like better.  So it&#8217;s seeming like this film gets awarded because it&#8217;s one of the most-seen of his films and because of its influence, not because it&#8217;s Rouch&#8217;s best work.<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts067.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><strong><em>Nicky&#8217;s Film</em> (1971, Abel Ferrara)</strong><br />
A mysteriously silent possibly gangster-related 6-minute film.  I can&#8217;t imagine even a Ferrara scholar gets much out of this.</p>
<p><strong><em>The Hold Up</em> (1972, Abel Ferrara)</strong><br />
Super-8 production made when Abel was 21, seven years before <em>Driller Killer</em>.  A few minutes in, I realized it&#8217;d be much better with the director commentary turned on.  &#8220;And away we go.  Wait, it&#8217;s the other way.  Which way is she looking?&#8221;  Um, some guys get fired from factory jobs, hold up a gas station, get caught.  The song &#8220;Working on a Building&#8221; is heard.<br />
<img src="/journal/image09/0911shorts116.jpg" alt="image"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/3726/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>La Commune, Paris 1871 (2000, Peter Watkins)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/724</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/724#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-ass movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starts at the end]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Story begins March 17, 1871 and ends two months later. Watkins introduces the movie via his two commune reporters (one of whom is played by Peter&#8217;s son Gérard, who has also acted in They Came Back and Diving Bell and the Butterfly), showing the set (a factory on the former site of Georges Melies&#8217; studio!) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Story begins March 17, 1871 and ends two months later.  Watkins introduces the movie via his two commune reporters (one of whom is played by Peter&#8217;s son Gérard, who has also acted in <em>They Came Back</em> and <em>Diving Bell and the Butterfly</em>), showing the set (a factory on the former site of Georges Melies&#8217; studio!) at the end of the shoot.  The set is minimal &#8211; walls and rooms were constructed, and props seem accurate and well-placed, but you never doubt that you&#8217;re on a set &#8211; you can see the walls, the lights, sort of Dogvillian.  And the camera &#8211; of course the actors talk directly to the camera, since this is a Peter Watkins film.  The cameraman (Odd Geir Saether from <em>Edvard Munch</em>) is always mobile, always shooting full cartridges at a time to be (slightly) edited later on.</p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/lacommune5.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p>There are intertitles which comment on the action, fill in missing context, flash-back-and-forward, connect the revolutionary ideas of the commune with the present realities of France.  People break out of character mid-scene to talk about the film and about their own present situations, to comment on the relevance of the film and of the commune &#8211; but they&#8217;re not talking to us, exactly, telling us what to do or think, it&#8217;s more that they&#8217;re working out their own thoughts and we can make what we will of it.  That&#8217;s not to say the film is unbiased &#8211; it&#8217;s extremely pro-commune.  The mass media is represented by a more traditionally shot right-wing telecast which gives twisted accounts of the events we see in the commune.</p>
<p><em>An official statement:</em><br />
<img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/lacommune4.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p>Most of the actors didn&#8217;t have screen credits before this one, but some have gone on to appear in other movies (<em>The Barbarian Invasions</em>, Eric Rohmer&#8217;s <em>Lady and the Duke</em>, <em>Science of Sleep</em>, <em>Miracle at St. Anna</em>, etc).  They workshopped the story and their own roles, and came up with their own dialogue, full participants of the film.  Some of this I learned from the very good hour-long doc on the disc <strong><em>The Universal Clock</em></strong>, which dares to ask questions (like whether Watkins is responsible for his own marginalization) as it discusses his career and the making of <em>La Commune</em>.  This would actually be a fine standalone film to play before some of PW&#8217;s better movies for the uninitiated &#8211; it stands high above the usual DVD-extra fare.</p>
<p><em>Lots of death and guns in the movie, all offscreen.  Nobody is ever shown killed, no actor ever plays dead:</em><br />
<img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/lacommune1.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot to say about the Commune and I&#8217;m not gonna say it all here.  I&#8217;m worn out on the topic from watching all seven hours on these DVDs, and I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;ll remember the important stuff (plus PW&#8217;s excellent website has a good summary).</p>
<p><em>The hated bourgeoisie:</em><br />
<img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/lacommune2.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p>Was the film <em>good</em>, though?  Well, it&#8217;s far from my favorite Watkins feature (I&#8217;d maybe put it above <em>The Gladiators</em>).  While it&#8217;s not dry and academic, it&#8217;s not exactly immersive &#8211; and while I wouldn&#8217;t say there were unnecessary scenes or that it should&#8217;ve been shorter, it&#8217;s exhausting at its present length, a mountain of a movie.  The guy&#8217;s got a point that films and videos should not have to fit the &#8220;universal clock&#8221; of a television schedule, but this one didn&#8217;t fit the clock of my work week, and even with Katy out of town and my evenings supposedly all to myself, it still took me three nights to watch.  So it&#8217;s an extremely admirable production, in every sense, about an important topic, but unlike other monumentally long films (hello, <em>Satantango</em>) I&#8217;m in no hurry to see it again.</p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/lacommune3.jpg" alt="image"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/724/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privilege (1967, Peter Watkins)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/674</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/674#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conformity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/?p=674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very good movie, though it didn&#8217;t strike me as completely excellent &#8211; fascinating to see Watkins&#8217; style applied to a fully fictional narrative. This movie&#8217;s complete obscurity and unavailability until two weeks ago on DVD really supports the director&#8217;s constant claims of marginalization. How can you continue your career when all your past work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good movie, though it didn&#8217;t strike me as completely excellent &#8211; fascinating to see Watkins&#8217; style applied to a fully fictional narrative.  This movie&#8217;s complete obscurity and unavailability until two weeks ago on DVD really supports the director&#8217;s constant claims of marginalization.  How can you continue your career when all your past work has been suppressed?  It&#8217;s a glimpse at where PW&#8217;s career could have gone.  Also interesting how all the reviews he quotes on the website attack the film&#8217;s shooting and editing style, calling it failed art, when I thought it was far more artfully put together than most movies of its time (although it&#8217;s not like I&#8217;ve seen BAFTA-winning <em>A Man For All Seasons</em> for comparison).</p>
<p>Paul Jones (former singer of top-ten UK band Manfred Mann) plays the top teen idol in Britain, Steve Shorter (sort of all four Beatles in one), who appeals to the youth with pain and rebellion, then is used by the government to promote peace and conformity.  Sidetracks along the way for a love interest (who was supposed to be painting Steve&#8217;s portrait but that was dropped pretty quickly), TV commercials to push surplus apples, a <em>Mr. Freedom</em> reminiscent (not least of all for its effective cheapness, walls covered in tin-foil) &#8220;Steve-mart&#8221; superstore, and concert footage including the very nazi-rally-like concert finale (15 years before <em>Pink Floyd&#8217;s The Wall</em>).  Sure Steve is a tool of the establishment, but he plays it too consciously, usually with an uncomfortable expression on his face (even in public).</p>
<p>Polish cinematographer Peter Suschitzky has had an awesome career, starting with <em>The War Game</em>, going through this and <em>Gladiators</em>, to Jacques Demy, to Ken Russell and <em>Rocky Horror</em>, to <em>Empire Strikes Back</em> and <em>Krull</em>, now shooting all David Cronenberg&#8217;s films since <em>Dead Ringers</em> (with time out for <em>Mars Attacks</em>).  All great-looking films.</p>
<p>Watkins:</p>
<blockquote><p>American novelist Norman Bognor and I adapted the script, which we retitled ‘Privilege’, to emphasize the significance of Steven Shorter as an allegory for the manner in which national states, working via religion, the mass media, sports, Popular Culture, etc., divert a potential political challenge by young people.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>1970: the first ticker-tape parade in Britain&#8217;s history:</em><br />
<img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/privilege1.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><em>Arty love interest Jean Shrimpton:</em><br />
<img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/privilege2.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><em>Steve goes all Mike D. on this advertising billboard:</em><br />
<img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/privilege3.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><em>Behind the scenes on the apple commercial:</em><br />
<img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/privilege4.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><em>Set for the big rally:</em><br />
<img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/privilege5.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p><em>Steve drives the message home:</em><br />
<img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/privilege6.jpg" alt="image"></p>
<p>Unlike the cop-out <em>Boogie Nights</em> reissue, this DVD includes the short bio-doc which was the inspiration for the film: <em><strong>Lonely Boy</strong></em>, about teen idol pop singer Paul Anka and his unreasonable screaming female fans.  <em>Lonely Boy</em> was released in &#8217;62, the same year he was second-billed (alphabetically, ha!) in <em>The Longest Day</em> with John Wayne, Robert Ryan and Sean Connery.  Three years earlier Paul was in the MST3K classic <em>Girls Town</em>.  The doc is good, made by two Oscar-nominated Canadians named Wolf and Roman, b/w in &#8220;verite&#8221; style, but there are voiceovers and lots of editing, so I&#8217;m not sure the label is appropriate.  Anka is a cutie but his songs aren&#8217;t all that.  He&#8217;s says to the camera that &#8220;it&#8217;s all about sex&#8221;, his manager admits to a nosejob, this was in &#8217;62!  Fun to watch them together, since <em>Privilege</em> steals a couple scenes wholesale from the doc.</p>
<p><em>Lonely Boy:</em><br />
<img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/image08/privilege7.jpg" alt="image"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/674/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Culloden (1964, Peter Watkins)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/138</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/138#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 03:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Watkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first, seemed like a not-at-all-interesting re-enactment of the last battle to be fought on British soil, when some Scottish Highlanders attacked to get their leader &#8220;restored&#8221; to the throne. The highlanders lacked the will, experience, rest, nourishment, preparation, leadership or equipment for victory and were easily defeated. But then it gets interesting, as the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first, seemed like a not-at-all-interesting re-enactment of the last battle to be fought on British soil, when some Scottish Highlanders attacked to get their leader &#8220;restored&#8221; to the throne.  The highlanders lacked the will, experience, rest, nourishment, preparation, leadership or equipment for victory and were easily defeated.</p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/images/culloden1.jpg" alt="image missing" /></p>
<p>But then it gets interesting, as the British soldiers not only defeat the Scots on the field, but chase down all retreaters and kill them, kill their families, and just destroy everything in a brutal rampage.  Seemingly even more critical of Britain than <em><a href="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/137">The War Game</a></em> was.  Watkins says he intended to draw parallels between the behavior of the British troops and that of US troops in Vietnam, which was going on at the time.</p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/images/culloden2.jpg" alt="image missing" /></p>
<p>Grainy and real looking, perfectly shot and acted, Watkins gets his point across easily.  Like <em>The War Game</em>, not too long.  Funny that the same guy should end up making such long movies (<em><a href="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/724">La Commune</a></em> is 6 hrs, <em>The Journey</em> is over 14 hrs).</p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/images/culloden3.jpg" alt="image missing" /></p>
<p>Peter Watkins&#8217; own account of the film: <a href="http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/PW_Culloden.htm">http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/PW_Culloden.htm</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m starting to think that everyone should see every Peter Watkins movie.  Too bad I started Katy on <em><a href="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/12">The Gladiators</a></em>, cuz now she probably won&#8217;t wanna see the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/138/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The War Game (1965, Peter Watkins)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/137</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/137#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 03:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A horrifying look at nuclear war. Should&#8217;ve been required viewing, but was instead banned from the airwaves for decades. Ho-hum. Short and to the point. Not only tells what might happen during a nuclear attack on Britain, but shows it, enacting the attack documentary-style. Below: a homeowner discusses self-defense. A powerfully convincing movie against the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A horrifying look at nuclear war.  Should&#8217;ve been required viewing, but was instead banned from the airwaves for decades.  Ho-hum.</p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/images/thewargame1.jpg" alt="image missing" /></p>
<p>Short and to the point.  Not only tells what might happen during a nuclear attack on Britain, but shows it, enacting the attack documentary-style.</p>
<p>Below: a homeowner discusses self-defense.</p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/images/thewargame2.jpg" alt="image missing" /></p>
<p>A powerfully convincing movie against the bomb.  Unfortunately also harshly critical of Britain and its policies, which I&#8217;m sure contributed to the film being banned for so long.</p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/images/thewargame3.jpg" alt="image missing" /></p>
<p>Of course, Watkins&#8217; own notes on the film are essential:<br />
<a href="http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/PW_Game.htm">http://www.mnsi.net/~pwatkins/PW_Game.htm</a></p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/images/thewargame4.jpg" alt="image missing" /></p>
<p>Katy didn&#8217;t watch it, but probably should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/137/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Punishment Park (1971, Peter Watkins)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/54</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/54#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In The Future, political dissidents in the USA are given a choice between long jail sentences or four days at &#8220;punishment park&#8221;, a desert training ground for law enforcement officials. If they can reach a target before the cops catch them, they&#8217;re free&#8230; if caught, they go to jail anyway. Movie has two settings&#8230; one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In The Future, political dissidents in the USA are given a choice between long jail sentences or four days at &#8220;punishment park&#8221;, a desert training ground for law enforcement officials.  If they can reach a target before the cops catch them, they&#8217;re free&#8230; if caught, they go to jail anyway.</p>
<p>Movie has two settings&#8230; one group at punishment park, and the tribunal for the next group to be sent&#8230; flips back and forth between them.  The group in &#8220;court&#8221; (a tent with card tables) is modeled on Abbie Hoffman and the Chicago Seven, with one member ending up bound and gagged.  Someone in the group at the park manages to kill a guard, and after that, it&#8217;s vengeance time&#8230; the whole group is gunned down as they are caught, with the camera crew first standing by, then trying ineffectively to help.</p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/images/punishmentpark.jpg" alt="Punishment Park" /></p>
<p>Not as interesting as <em><a href="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/12">The Gladiators</a></em>, I think, but a lot more straightforward.  Can&#8217;t decide if I really liked it.  Covers a lot of facets of 60&#8242;s radicalism, the straight world&#8217;s reaction to it, and the direction the country was going politically.  Useful as an alternate-history lesson, maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/54/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gladiators (1969, Peter Watkins)</title>
		<link>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/12</link>
		<comments>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Watkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cerebral, kinda unengaging movie. Interestingly done though. Allegorial, with each person representing a country or type. Seemed like a total bust for a while there, but as I was getting disappointed I asked myself &#8220;why is the movie doing this?&#8221; and figured out the allegory. A message movie then, the message being that there&#8217;s only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cerebral, kinda unengaging movie.  Interestingly done though.  Allegorial, with each person representing a country or type.  Seemed like a total bust for a while there, but as I was getting disappointed I asked myself &#8220;why is the movie doing this?&#8221; and figured out the allegory.  A message movie then, the message being that there&#8217;s only one System that all countries and governments (even the neutrals) help perpetuate.  I wasn&#8217;t as impressed with the combat scenes as everyone in the reviews and commentary was &#8211; more interested in the politics of the thing.  As a political statement, it&#8217;s pretty wonderful.  Probably needs another viewing sometime.  Katy was cool on it but &#8220;didn&#8217;t hate it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also on the disc was <strong><em>Diary of an Unknown Soldier</em></strong>, apparently the first short Watkins made that he still likes.  The last day of a soldier&#8217;s life before being sent to the front, so another war commentary, told all in narration.  I like Watkins&#8217; style &#8211; it&#8217;s not like anything else I&#8217;ve been watching.  Which makes me wonder why I haven&#8217;t sat down with <em><a href="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/54">Punishment Park</a></em> yet.  Seems like all of his stuff should be worth seeing.</p>
<p><img src="http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/images/gladiators.jpg" alt="Gladiators" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

